• Announcements

    • Admin4

      TAMB CLOSURE ANNOUNCEMENT   09/06/2017

      Following diminishing numbers of visitors to TAMB and the subsequent reduction in TAMB income, it is the intention for TAMB to close definitively from 1st November 2017. TAMB can no longer generate enough advertising revenue to cover the costs of around £300/month to pay for the dedicated server that hosts the TAMB software.  The dedicated server is also older equipment and no longer maintainable, so at some point it would be necessary to migrate the TAMB to a new cloud-based platform. This is quite a large job and would take some time to do. We feel it wouldn't be a worthwhile task given the reduction in traffic and usage of TAMB.  It is the opinion of the TAMB Team that the days of messageboards have largely gone, being overtaken by other platforms. Thank you to all users of the TAMB over the years, and we look forward to seeing you on some other online forums in the future. Since announcing the closure, a number of questions have been asked.

      This is not a "boot in the arse" to Board members to increase traffic.

      It’s worth pointing out to any people wanting to take on the TAMB that they will quickly outstrip any “free” message board system. That’s what happened with the pre-2003 TAMB and also happened during the “current TAMB” in 2003 – 2004. 
      It’s all about the number of concurrent users online. At a point yesterday there were about 150 users online – Invision would be charging $130 per month for that. (https://invisioncommunity.com/buy)

      We would be prepared to do a handover of the domain names that we currently hold to non-profit making group who seriously wants to organise a new TAMB and has the skills and numbers to do it. This would not include existing software or server. We are especially keen that the platform or the name do not fall into the hands of what we can only call bawbags. We need not mention names, but I'm sure members can think of a few. Any new group would have to start from scratch and give TAMB a complete bottom up ‘makeover’ and make themselves financially viable.   We have a couple of people who are willing to offer advice to any serious players. The TAMB Team
    • Admin4

      Further to the Closure Announcement   09/07/2017

      Since announcing the closure, a number of questions have been asked.

      This is not a "boot in the arse" to Board members to increase traffic.

      It’s worth pointing out to any people wanting to take on the TAMB that they will quickly outstrip any “free” message board system. That’s what happened with the pre-2003 TAMB and also happened during the “current TAMB” in 2003 – 2004. hence the "high" cost of keeping the Board going.
      It’s all about the number of concurrent users online. At a point yesterday there were about 150 users online – Invision would be charging $130 per month for that. (https://invisioncommunity.com/buy)

      We would be prepared to do a handover of the domain names that we currently hold to a non-profit making group which seriously wants to organise a new TAMB and has the skills and numbers to do it. This would not include existing software or server. We are especially keen that the platform or the name do not fall into the hands of what we can only call bawbags. We need not mention names, but I'm sure members can think of a few. Any new group would have to start from scratch and give TAMB a complete bottom up ‘makeover’ and make themselves financially viable. We have a couple of people who are willing to offer advice to any serious players. The TAMB Team

Scotty CTA

Member
  • Content count

    2,375
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About Scotty CTA

  • Birthday 03/08/1961

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Toronto

Previous Fields

  • TA Club
    CTA and ATA

Recent Profile Visitors

8,793 profile views
  1. I've been busy renovating the addition to my house... That's only the illusion you have from your perspective (believing in the sizes and distances you've been indoctrinated with). The one I showed you does those things.
  2. It's an illusion. Just tried to show that you can't see a curve no matter how high you go. Try it yourself without a fish-eye lens, then. Thank you.
  3. That's a good way of putting it. Thank you. Nope... fish-eye lens. Go to the folk with the videos that don't slink to such tricks.
  4. The world never ends. Only the 'age' ends (and only the Father knows the time of Jesus' return). Once again it'll be rubbish that'll be credited to 'Christians'. It's a relatively new line of thinking for me. GPS was strategically named (just like The Federal Reserve... Neither 'Federal' or a 'Reserve'). There is no 'globe' and there are no 'satellites'. All of the 'GPS' info is land-based... from towers, etc. Yay! Their 'hidden in plain sight' MO isn't about to change any time soon... Apart from it not being true? You can't justify that conclusion from what you've said here. Yes, curved to flat won't work accurately but... so? Just like old times! Does the speck know (really know) what the speck is standing on? Seriously? Then why are all the 'NASA earths' the same size? It's not funny at all. Everyone understands that (but that's not what the image shows). It shows a continent getting bigger while the 'ball' earth remains the same size. You only believe it to be higher in the middle because you believe in a spinning 'ball' earth. Now only if the Pacific Ocean consisted of one drop of water.
  5. It would only be a good point if I were posting videos claiming that they were actual footage of a flat, motionless earth (taken from goodness knows where). The videos I post contain information and graphics of models that show how the flat motionless earth could work. My hope was for you to see that there is an alternative explanation to what we've been conditioned to believe (and I believe that that has now happened). Thank you for taking the time to write that, Nobby. I believe that you mentioned that you had a couple of boys. Sincere best wishes to you and your family. Satan, his demons, and the 'world elite' who worship them. You only thought you did. The non-existent curve can't be seen from as high up as we can really go (so you didn't see it from a ship, Mate).
  6. You haven't even seen that with your own eyes. How can you say that it's "for sure". What's "for sure" is that folk believe it (but that doesn't make it true). I've answered this a few times... The 'special creation' of a flat, motionless geocentric earth eliminates 'big bang' and 'evolution', and guarantees 'God'. Everyone is out of step but 'Our Jock'. How the chips fall in my pursuit of 'why I am who I am' (aka... the truth) isn't my concern. I have a really good, highly educated (non-Christian) friend who says that he is going to come over and prove to me that the earth is a spinning 'ball'. (He tracks 'satellites' too.) I don't know. It could be 'CD' shaped. One goal (as always) is to get folk to question why they believe what they do. Is it because everyone else seems to believe it? Is it because of peer pressure? Is it because it's formally taught? Is it because they feel that they understand it (and do they realise that understanding a theory doesn't necessarily mean that that's the way it is?)
  7. Relative to a flat motionless earth. There's no such thing as a giant mass of curved water on (say) the Pacific Ocean over a 'globe'. There is no 'force' that holds that amount of water against a spinning planet while at the same time allows steam to rise and wee insects to float about. Gravity couldn't be that selective. Disprove it. Not true. One of the videos shows how the flat earth model would work. That's not 'nothing'. It's the concept explained in a visual. Showing a 'ball' earth by CGI and fake astro'nots' with tons of hairspray and harnesses against green/blue screens isn't science. (My goodness.) If you had any actual proof we wouldn't be having this conversation. Nope. To avoid complaints about a thread being hijacked I felt that there should be one thread for 9/11 and another for flat/globe earth. I'm for clarity, while others are more than happy to muddy the waters. Tell me why the flat earth model doesn't work. My only preconception was a previous belief in a 'ball' earth. Not one true word there, Donald. I'm only human. It's very possible that I missed something, and lack of time is a universal problem (so could be 'guilty' there as well). Please repeat the point that you think I'm avoiding.
  8. Congratulations to Motherwell. Hope you win it!
  9. Pointing to the exact location of where he had the horns removed...
  10. Of course you do. Like what? (And if it's the shape of the plane we live on then please go to the appropriate thread as we wouldn't want 'tuppence' to have any more tantrums.) The two of you in one place could wipe out a small city with the vibe off your smugness alone. (Welcome back btw, Egghead.)
  11. You are so superior. (O to be there when it all comes crashing down for you.)
  12. No, that never happened (as you well know). I found and posted an image for the purpose of showing how a flat earth could still be both a 'circle' and have '4 points' only. You (being low) then went and tried to apply that image to what had been said after the conversation had progressed (and here you are trying to do it again). Once again.I do not subscribe to that model but it was all that I could find in an attempt to show you what you asked.
  13. The number one reason would be time. The number two reason is that I'm content with what I believe happened that day. (I don't think that I can take it any further but would love for something new to come up.)
  14. Without God, both you and I are dirt, however, in your case you are dirt that vainly and defiantly believes he doesn't need God because everything about Him is B.S. You start with the false premise that we are (impossibly) complex from being fantastically random which allows you to be your own (fool) god. "I'll just believe 'this' and attach the label science to it and no one can argue as there is nothing higher." God created the laws of science but He isn't bound by them. God Trumps science. God created all things, including science. He imparted the laws of science into people’s minds. I think God created science to work according to His will and purpose, to make us stand in awe of Him, not to make us stand in awe of ourselves and our achievements. We’ve taken a hold of scientific knowledge and have basically shoved God into a box. We’ve taken our scientific studies and data and have told God, “You can only work within these walls. Anything outside of that is off-limits.” The thing is, God doesn’t fit nicely into this box. In fact, God resides outside of any box made by humans. Truth is, science testifies to the Creator; it speaks of His brilliance, complexity, and fame. See, while God loves science and uses it to reveal Himself through, I don’t think we should use science to try and trump God. I think, in every case, God should trump science. Why? Cause our God is greater than science.