Scotty CTA Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 47 minutes ago, Caledonian Craig said: Of course the moon landings happened - the proof is irrefutable. Pah-leeze! 48 minutes ago, Caledonian Craig said: Moon rocks examined by scientists from all over the world - all agree could only come from the vacuums of space. Whatever... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html 49 minutes ago, Caledonian Craig said: And here is the real clincher - the USSR. They were in a bitter and crucial race to the moon with the USA. Theatre... actors playing roles... ("Ridicule and Hate will be the next stop Ladies and Gentlemen... Ridicule and Hate... Please keep your arms inside the moving vehicle... ") Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoobydoo Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 1 hour ago, biffer said: Scott has also ignored the question of why the sky is different in the Southern Hemisphere. I'd like an explanation of that. But I won't get one that makes any sense if I get one at all. You have to cut him some slack here. He's only been studying this for a few hundred hours. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eisegerwind Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 33 minutes ago, Scotty CTA said: Pah-leeze! Whatever... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html Theatre... actors playing roles... ("Ridicule and Hate will be the next stop Ladies and Gentlemen... Ridicule and Hate... Please keep your arms inside the moving vehicle... ") I got on at ridicule a while ago, dont think there will be anymore room at hate cos you and god seem to have taken all the seats. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biffer Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, Scotty CTA said: Whatever... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html In this case, Scott trusts the opinion of scientists. Selective evidence is no evidence at all. The same scientist confirmed that the other piece of moon rock in the museum is genuine. But undoubtedly he's just part of the conspiracy as well. Which begs the question of why Scott would believe his opinion about the first piece. Edited February 11, 2017 by biffer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caledonian Craig Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 51 minutes ago, biffer said: In this case, Scott trusts the opinion of scientists. Selective evidence is no evidence at all. The same scientist confirmed that the other piece of moon rock in the museum is genuine. But undoubtedly he's just part of the conspiracy as well. Which begs the question of why Scott would believe his opinion about the first piece. Precisely. And why on Earth would the Russians accept being actors in a US play? What Scotty is claiming is that every single scientist/astronomer/Joe Bloggs in the world who owns a half decent telescope are all part of this conspiracy and every one of them sworn to secrecy even though they have no connection at all with NASA. Truly bizarre. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biffer Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, Caledonian Craig said: Precisely. And why on Earth would the Russians accept being actors in a US play? What Scotty is claiming is that every single scientist/astronomer/Joe Bloggs in the world who owns a half decent telescope are all part of this conspiracy and every one of them sworn to secrecy even though they have no connection at all with NASA. Truly bizarre. That would include me, with my Astronomy degree, working for the UK government and making satellites and Astronomy equipment. Which is probably why my questions go unanswered - I'm compromised in some way in his world. Edited February 11, 2017 by biffer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caledonian Craig Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 4 minutes ago, biffer said: That would include me, with my Astronomy degree, working for the UK government and making satellites and Astronomy equipment. Which is probably why my questions go unanswered - I'm compromised in some way in his world. You can tell us biffer how much have NASA paid you for your silence? ;-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biffer Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 12 minutes ago, Caledonian Craig said: You can tell us biffer how much have NASA paid you for your silence? ;-) I fukkin wish. Getting money out of NASA is bloody impossible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biffer Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 And as Scott knows, because he's seen it, the level of drunk I get pretty much ensures I wouldn't keep my mouth shut if I was part of a conspiracy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caledonian Craig Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 5 minutes ago, biffer said: I fukkin wish. Getting money out of NASA is bloody impossible. Just wondered how much your silence would cost? Then work out how much NASA would have had to pay to the Russian population, every scientist, every astronomer and every amateur star gazer in the world there is. Eg £10,000 by around 500 million people - I wonder if Scotty would care to work out how much money that is? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toepoke Posted February 11, 2017 Author Share Posted February 11, 2017 I'd like to know how this could've been faked in 1973... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ally Bongo Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ally Bongo Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 Scotland at 16.25 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shed_Tartan_Army_Yeah Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 On 11/02/2017 at 5:14 AM, Scotty CTA said: "All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness," 2 Timothy 3:16 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty CTA Posted February 14, 2017 Share Posted February 14, 2017 And you think that's real? Does the scale look about right to you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty CTA Posted February 14, 2017 Share Posted February 14, 2017 On 2/11/2017 at 7:09 AM, Eisegerwind said: I got on at ridicule a while ago, dont think there will be anymore room at hate cos you and god seem to have taken all the seats. We Christians definitely receive a lot of hate our way, but our response has to be love. On 2/11/2017 at 8:49 AM, Caledonian Craig said: Precisely. And why on Earth would the Russians accept being actors in a US play? It's not a U.S. play, it's a Luciferian play. On 2/11/2017 at 8:49 AM, Caledonian Craig said: What Scotty is claiming is that every single scientist/astronomer/Joe Bloggs in the world who owns a half decent telescope are all part of this conspiracy and every one of them sworn to secrecy even though they have no connection at all with NASA. Truly bizarre. No. You're claiming that I'm claiming that. On 2/11/2017 at 11:56 AM, Toepoke said: I'd like to know how this could've been faked in 1973... The Wizard Of Oz, 1939... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty CTA Posted February 14, 2017 Share Posted February 14, 2017 On 2/11/2017 at 4:08 AM, Ally Bongo said: Quoting something written by a man is pointless Your freewill allows you to make the decision to reject God. Once you die, however, you won't have any say as to the consequences of that decision. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty CTA Posted February 14, 2017 Share Posted February 14, 2017 15 hours ago, Shed_Tartan_Army_Yeah said: 'And it didn't get you anywhere" except Heaven-bound... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toepoke Posted February 14, 2017 Author Share Posted February 14, 2017 3 hours ago, Scotty CTA said: We Christians definitely receive a lot of hate our way Especially the Christians who walked on the moon. 3 hours ago, Scotty CTA said: The Wizard Of Oz, 1939... Not sure a brief scratchy animation however impressive it was at the time can compare to the hundreds of hours of footage taken in zero gravity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orraloon Posted February 14, 2017 Share Posted February 14, 2017 14 minutes ago, Toepoke said: Especially the Christians who walked on the moon. Not sure a brief scratchy animation however impressive it was at the time can compare to the hundreds of hours of footage taken in zero gravity. Zero gravity? On the moon? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonnyTJS Posted February 14, 2017 Share Posted February 14, 2017 6 minutes ago, Orraloon said: Zero gravity? On the moon? He's referring to footage from Skylab. Do keep up ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biffer Posted February 14, 2017 Share Posted February 14, 2017 Still no answer to dust. Still no answer to the movements of stars. Still no answer to different constellations in the southern hemisphere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonnyTJS Posted February 14, 2017 Share Posted February 14, 2017 1 hour ago, biffer said: Still no answer to dust. Still no answer to the movements of stars. Still no answer to different constellations in the southern hemisphere. Or the 'circular' Earth having four corners in John 7:1. Or an acknowledgement that he misled us about Biblical Hebrew using 'sphere'. Or a rebuttal of the '79 - '82 polar circumnavigation, following his claim that such a thing had never been attempted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biffer Posted February 14, 2017 Share Posted February 14, 2017 1 hour ago, DonnyTJS said: Or the 'circular' Earth having four corners in John 7:1. Or an acknowledgement that he misled us about Biblical Hebrew using 'sphere'. Or a rebuttal of the '79 - '82 polar circumnavigation, following his claim that such a thing had never been attempted. Scott's previously said the only bible that counts is the James I bible and anything in the hebrew text isn't relevant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freeedom Posted February 14, 2017 Share Posted February 14, 2017 I see this place hasn't changed much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.