ParisInAKilt Posted September 10, 2017 Author Share Posted September 10, 2017 4 hours ago, Dave78 said: Thing is, look at the history of warfare (and that's what 9/11 was really...war), and you'll find loads of examples of a new weapon (in this case passenger planes flown by suicidal pilots) completely outfoxing the enemy and doing damage never thought possible by the other side. Don't think I believe that anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biffer Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 If you want some complete loons, have a look at some of the vids knocking about at the moment about Hurricanes Harvey and Irma being due to HAARPS and the US government weather weaponisation programme. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ParisInAKilt Posted September 10, 2017 Author Share Posted September 10, 2017 Not sure of the relevance chemtrails, moon landings and weapononised weather have to do with having a proper investigation into what happened on 9/11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
northernscum Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 49 minutes ago, ParisInAKilt said: Not sure of the relevance chemtrails, moon landings and weapononised weather have to do with having a proper investigation into what happened on 9/11 It's obviously an attempt to conflate the absolute idiots who believe there is conspiracy in everything, with the 9/11 "official position" doubters. If they are all seen as completely barking mad, it makes the cover-up far easier to maintain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty CTA Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 2 hours ago, ParisInAKilt said: Not sure of the relevance chemtrails, moon landings and weapononised weather have to do with having a proper investigation into what happened on 9/11 Everything is connected. Figure out any one of JFK, moon landings, 9/11, 7/7, flat earth, etc. and you'll figure them all out. Creation over evolution is the way to go though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ally Bongo Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 5 minutes ago, Scotty CTA said: Creation over evolution is the way to go though. Where do you actually start with this moronic ideology Some folk are just determined to be slaves Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty CTA Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 1 minute ago, Ally Bongo said: Where do you actually start? You could start by explaining how the literally billions of pieces of information of DNA get into a single cell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ally Bongo Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 3 minutes ago, Scotty CTA said: You could start by explaining how the literally billions of pieces of information of DNA get into a single cell. google it https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/dna-packaging-nucleosomes-and-chromatin-310 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty CTA Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 I was at my optometrist last month. He took a photo of my eye and then showed it to me. He said "This is the optic nerve. (It was barely a dot, btw.) It has over 1.5 million connections to the brain." I said "So we were created, then?" And he said "You'd think so." Creation by an intelligent designer is obvious. Look around you. Life... plants, animals, people aren't 'random'. They couldn't be. The one thing that evolutionists rely on... time, is the very thing that would work against them. One species can't wait around for millions upon millions of years for something to 'evolve' so that they can eat it. The food chain had to be in sync from the beginning. Everything had to 'appear' at the same time. It's the only explanation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toepoke Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 Yay! Let's debate the flat earth again, the last days of the TAMB are going to be fun.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty CTA Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 17 minutes ago, Ally Bongo said: Where do you actually start? Of the literally billions upon billions upon billions of beneficial mutations needed for the evolutionary 'process' to be true, you could start by naming just ONE beneficial mutation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ally Bongo Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 5 minutes ago, Scotty CTA said: I was at my optometrist last month. He took a photo of my eye and then showed it to me. He said "This is the optic nerve. (It was barely a dot, btw.) It has over 1.5 million connections to the brain." I said "So we were created, then?" And he said "You'd think so." Creation by an intelligent designer is obvious. Look around you. Life... plants, animals, people aren't 'random'. They couldn't be. The one thing that evolutionists rely on... time, is the very thing that would work against them. One species can't wait around for millions upon millions of years for something to 'evolve' so that they can eat it. The food chain had to be in sync from the beginning. Everything had to 'appear' at the same time. It's the only explanation. This here is what you would call ignorant primary school knowledge from adults who have no interest in educating themselves further on the subject Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ally Bongo Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 6 minutes ago, Scotty CTA said: Of the literally billions upon billions upon billions of beneficial mutations needed for the evolutionary 'process' to be true, you could start by naming just ONE beneficial mutation. Increased bone density There's your one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty CTA Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 (edited) 21 minutes ago, Toepoke said: Yay! Let's debate the flat earth again, the last days of the TAMB are going to be fun.... 9 hours ago, Scotty CTA said: Pseudo science tells us that the 'ball' earth is almost 25,000 miles in circumference. If true, then pythagorean theorem will help toward calculating the 'curve' of the earth (which works out to 8 inches x miles squared). So, 8 inches for the first mile, 32 inches for the second mile, 6 feet for the third mile, 10 feet for the fourth mile, 16 feet for the fifth mile, etc. At 10 miles the 'drop over the curve' should be 66 feet, but there are loads and loads of examples worldwide of people seeing entire buildings and skylines that they shouldn't be able to (given the distance) as they should be below the curve on a 'sphere'. So, either the earth is a lot, lot larger than 25,000 miles in circumference (which they would know about having travelled to the moon and back at the first time of asking) or it's flat. And since everyone has been brainwashed with a false model of where we are (in 'space') and what 'orbits' what... the correct answer is that the earth is flat and motionless. It even feels motionless and looks flat when you are walking around on it. "He stretches out the North over the void and hangs the earth on nothing." Job 26:7 Edited September 10, 2017 by Scotty CTA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty CTA Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 10 minutes ago, Ally Bongo said: This here is what you would call ignorant primary school knowledge from adults who have no interest in educating themselves further on the subject Out of ammo and name-calling already. 8 minutes ago, Ally Bongo said: Increased bone density Explain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phart Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 Why would the pythagorean theorem help you work out the curvature of the earth? You need to answer that first since all the rest is built on it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phart Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 (edited) We know the earth isn't a sphere as well. So again a wrong assumption. Edited September 10, 2017 by phart Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty CTA Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 1 minute ago, phart said: Why would the pythagorean theorem help you work out the curvature of the earth? You need to answer that first since all the rest is built on it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty CTA Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 1 minute ago, phart said: We know the earth isn't a sphere as well? Then you're going to have to explain the photos that NASA keeps showing us because everything else would be built on that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phart Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Scotty CTA said: That'sa wrong, it's confusing 2d space with 3d space. I don't know about wikipedia, I was taught cos(C/R) = cos(A/R) cos(B/R) was the equation for spherical pythagorean theorems. It even says in the video "ignoring the effect of atmospheric refraction" So ignoring something that occurs in the real world, it's BBC Bitesize science. Simplified so people can understand it, or not as the case is. Edited September 10, 2017 by phart Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toepoke Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 If the planet isn't spinning then where does the sun go at night? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phart Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 4 minutes ago, Scotty CTA said: Then you're going to have to explain the photos that NASA keeps showing us because everything else would be built on that. Showing us what? The earth isn't a sphere. Are you arguing it now is? I thought you thought it was flat? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ally Bongo Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 7 minutes ago, Scotty CTA said: Out of ammo and name-calling already. Explain. No - not at all Scotty All explanations to your questions are easily available online The fact that you still ask them proves you dont want to know the answers as you dont like them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eisegerwind Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 1 minute ago, Toepoke said: If the planet isn't spinning then where does the sun go at night? God switches it on and off with his big on/off switch. It's not like a wall mounted one it's one of those big lever ones you get in films. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phart Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 No point asking Scotty he doesn't know it well enough to explain it himself, he just points to his book as usual. Dogma rules him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.5eeaf0fbe501ba3c868c32fd77caef1f.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.