RenfrewBlue Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 19 hours ago, irnbruman said: Certainly was twisting my words. What I suggested was that if both parties are not sober - can the man determine whther the woman is unable to give consent - if he was sober and she was pissed then Id say there is a possibility of him determining that - even if the woman asks for sex. If they have both been drinking and the woman wants to have sex (as opposed to the man forcing himself upon her) then I would hazard a guess that extremely few men would say -hang on a minute - although she is asking to have sex- I don't think she is capable of giving consent. This whole area is a minefield and in my opinion extremely different from having sex against the will of the woman. Utter tripe. If you're drunk and you have sex, you're leaving yourself open to accusations. And that would be your own fault as you chose to get drunk. Control is in your own hands (so to speak!) and shagging a drunk lassie is a stupid thing to do at any time. And just to make things clear, Evans was sober. This excuse doesn't wash for him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thplinth Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 This has to be a case of the most tedious white knight man in the entire history of the internet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cove_Sheep Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 12 hours ago, OLAS said: Louch. It said so in black and white pixels. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaid Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 24 minutes ago, RenfrewBlue said: If you're drunk and you have sex, you're leaving yourself open to accusations. And that would be your own fault as you chose to get drunk. Control is in your own hands (so to speak!) and shagging a drunk lassie is a stupid thing to do at any time. But crucially, not illegal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larky Masher Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 27 minutes ago, aaid said: But crucially, not illegal. Being drunk would not be accepted as defence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaid Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 21 minutes ago, Larky Masher said: Being drunk would not be accepted as defence. I was talking about the girl. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RenfrewBlue Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 1 hour ago, aaid said: But crucially, not illegal. As long as it's legal you're happy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larky Masher Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 1 hour ago, aaid said: I was talking about the girl. If she was in such a condition that her capacity to give consent was impaired then you'd be on very thin ice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaid Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 42 minutes ago, Larky Masher said: If she was in such a condition that her capacity to give consent was impaired then you'd be on very thin ice. Absolutely, but as I understand it, the new evidence that has forced the retrial brings into question the level of her impairment - which is what the original conviction was predicated on. 1 hour ago, RenfrewBlue said: As long as it's legal you're happy? Completely irrelevant what I think, it's what the law says that is important. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garywag Posted April 26, 2016 Share Posted April 26, 2016 20 hours ago, RenfrewBlue said: As long as it's legal you're happy? 2.5 years in jail and your career ruined for something that's legal but immoral? Seems harsh* *Based on the evidence of the new trial proving him not guilty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cove_Sheep Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirk Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 8 minutes ago, Cove_Sheep said: Fair play to him staying fit for a start. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan cake Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 very surprised hertz werent in for him they've got previous for this sort of thing disgusting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbcmfc Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 2 hours ago, dan cake said: very surprised hertz werent in for him they've got previous for this sort of thing disgusting Bizarre rant! I don't know the ins and outs of the case (excuse pun), but there's obviously a bit of doubt if he's got an appeal. Innocent until proven guilty and all that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cove_Sheep Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 3 minutes ago, sbcmfc said: Bizarre rant! I don't know the ins and outs of the case (excuse pun), but there's obviously a bit of doubt if he's got an appeal. Innocent until proven guilty and all that. He won his appeal. It's a re-trial that's pending. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan cake Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 29 minutes ago, sbcmfc said: Bizarre rant! I don't know the ins and outs of the case (excuse pun), but there's obviously a bit of doubt if he's got an appeal. Innocent until proven guilty and all that. aye yer right, hertz prefer them guilty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Return of Yermaw Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 3 hours ago, sbcmfc said: Bizarre rant! indeed. no reference to the EPL. at all. very bizarre. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbcmfc Posted August 6, 2016 Share Posted August 6, 2016 burst my coupon with an equaliser against Oxford. I presume the Oxford defenders were asleep when he sneaked in to score.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parklife Posted August 6, 2016 Author Share Posted August 6, 2016 Jokes about rape are always a laugh. Good one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbcmfc Posted August 6, 2016 Share Posted August 6, 2016 11 minutes ago, Parklife said: Jokes about rape are always a laugh. Good one. Not always, sometimes they're in really bad taste. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glasgowmancity Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Found Not Guilty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neilser Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Not a rapist then - only a total k unt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angus_Young Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Bloody hell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RenfrewBlue Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 41 minutes ago, neilser said: Not a rapist then - only a total k unt. Sums it up quite nicely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dipped flake Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 I presumed he would be found innocent so no surprise at the verdict. Not guilty, just a thoroughly disgusting individual. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.5eeaf0fbe501ba3c868c32fd77caef1f.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.