Rangers are Rocking; Scottys Financial insight inside. - Page 396 - Football related - Discussion of non TA football - Tartan Army Message Board Jump to content

Rangers are Rocking; Scottys Financial insight inside.


Speirs  

64 members have voted

  1. 1. Was Speirs talking the truth or lying

    • Yes
      54
    • No
      10

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

This is grudged but.....

8 hours ago, Mark frae Crieff said:

This is how it feels to be Rangers

This is how it feels to be small

This is how it feels to put your passport back in the drawer

:sing:

:lol:

And....

1 hour ago, Reevesy said:

They always did have a problem with Progres, most of them are still living in 1690.

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the early KO etc. Rangers must have been the 1st team out of Europe.

:lol:

Its funnier because of the joy many of them taken out of Motherwell, aberdeeen etc "embarrassing Scottish football" losing to Panathinaikos, real sociedad (ok and stjarnan).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Bino's said:

sirokej brijeg

probably tough...sadly

So do you want to bet £50 or were you just talking shite? 

Edited by Parklife
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Squirrelhumper said:

Don't talk sh1te.

Aberdeen would have wiped the floor with that mob last night. I watched it in the boozer and they were utter sh1te.

You seem upset.

Did Aberdeen not lose to a team in Luxembourg last season?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Reevesy said:

What's the consequences of them winning or losing that? I genuinely can't even remember.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/40498020

HMRC win and Rangers/BDO are due the tax on the EBT's. It confirms that Rangers used an illegal tax scheme to get players they other wise could not have afforded. In essence, they cheated. 

HMRC lose and they may end up getting sued by Rangers/BDO for forcing them to insolvency. The recipients of the EBT's will also be liable for the tax that should've been paid on the EBT's.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Parklife said:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/40498020

HMRC win and Rangers/BDO are due the tax on the EBT's. It confirms that Rangers used an illegal tax scheme to get players they other wise could not have afforded. In essence, they cheated. 

HMRC lose and they may end up getting sued by Rangers/BDO for forcing them to insolvency. The recipients of the EBT's will also be liable for the tax that should've been paid on the EBT's.  

Cheers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Parklife said:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/40498020

HMRC win and Rangers/BDO are due the tax on the EBT's. It confirms that Rangers used an illegal tax scheme to get players they other wise could not have afforded. In essence, they cheated. 

HMRC lose and they may end up getting sued by Rangers/BDO for forcing them to insolvency. The recipients of the EBT's will also be liable for the tax that should've been paid on the EBT's.  

weird that if HMRC lose the McLeishe's etc have to pay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Parklife said:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/40498020

HMRC win and Rangers/BDO are due the tax on the EBT's. It confirms that Rangers used an illegal tax scheme to get players they other wise could not have afforded. In essence, they cheated. 

HMRC lose and they may end up getting sued by Rangers/BDO for forcing them to insolvency. The recipients of the EBT's will also be liable for the tax that should've been paid on the EBT's.  

i think you may have that the wrong way round. Now they will be liable. ho ho!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Reevesy said:

What's the consequences of them winning or losing that? I genuinely can't even remember.

It also means the creditors who had HMRC lost might have been expecting say (for example) 25p in the pound back (due the 27m the got back from suing the lawyers minus fees etc) will now get back more like 1p in the pound of less as HMRC just added a huge bill into the creditors pot.

One of the people most hit by this is a Mr Dave King who was owed 20m by old RFC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, thplinth said:

i think you may have that the wrong way round. Now they will be liable. ho ho!

Surely the "side letters" indemnify the individuals? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...