Debian Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 3 minutes ago, ShedTA said: Who? and why do you care? Thought so Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShedTA Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 57 minutes ago, Debian said: Thought so Tbh i dont think you do think much at all but whatever you want - weirdo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShedTA Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 59 minutes ago, Debian said: Thought so Oh and i forgot to mention, wherever i saw it is none of your f@cking business really. That's all Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toepoke Posted September 9, 2017 Share Posted September 9, 2017 Seems to be quite a ding-dong going on between Regan and Lawwell over the Rangers verdict. Sportsound could be interesting later.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveyDenoon Posted September 9, 2017 Share Posted September 9, 2017 24 minutes ago, Toepoke said: Seems to be quite a ding-dong going on between Regan and Lawwell over the Rangers verdict. Sportsound could be interesting later.... I'm not a huge Lawwell fan, there's something about him I'm not sure about. But he is bang on the money on this issue. Rangers cheated and gained a massive advantage on the pitch as a direct result of that cheating. I see no way in which that can be seriously disputed by anyone other than those who have a vested interest. As an absolute minimum there is a case to answer. The abject failure of the SFA to support an investigation is nothing other than a severe dereliction of duty. To hide behind the supposed damage to Scottish football's reputation that would occur by "raking over the coals" as they rather awkwardly put it is embarrassing and naive in the extreme. It is a long standing principle of any justice system within organisations that any potential wrongdoing must be investigated thoroughly and consequences brought to bear where wrongdoing is found to have taken place, no matter how long it takes, no matter what else may be dredged up in the process and no matter the damage to the reputation of those concerned. The fact that the SFA has chosen to bury its head in the sand and shy away from such a process serves only to further prove their substantial lack of fitness to oversee and govern our game. Time and again the SFA has proved itself unfit for purpose. The supposed damage to our game's reputation the SFA claims would occur by carrying out an investigation is nothing compared to he damage being done to our game's reputation by NOT carrying out an investigation into these matters. Not for the first time, the SFA has allowed itself to be manipulated and driven by fear of offending a big club and it's often rabid support rather than doing what is right and proper. For the good of Scottish football there MUST be a full and thorough investigation into this issue no matter the consequences for any individual(s) or organisation(s) concerned. And it must be fully open and transparent. It looks like once again it is going to be down to the fans to voice their opinions and force the issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty CTA Posted September 9, 2017 Share Posted September 9, 2017 Rangers cheated. Fans of the other teams want the rules applied. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShedTA Posted September 9, 2017 Share Posted September 9, 2017 It was very simple for the sfa to agree with a review as per spfl request. Nothing to lose - or is there? Think Regan is f@cked now and so he should be. Needs a full clear our and a full independent review of all facts - not just those selected by the sfa, as per nms enquiry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Debian Posted September 9, 2017 Share Posted September 9, 2017 Shed and Scotty - moonhowlers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShedTA Posted September 9, 2017 Share Posted September 9, 2017 2 hours ago, Debian said: Shed and Scotty - moonhowlers Debian - Tw@t. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Langtonian Posted September 9, 2017 Share Posted September 9, 2017 5 hours ago, DaveyDenoon said: I'm not a huge Lawwell fan, there's something about him I'm not sure about. But he is bang on the money on this issue. Rangers cheated and gained a massive advantage on the pitch as a direct result of that cheating. I see no way in which that can be seriously disputed by anyone other than those who have a vested interest. As an absolute minimum there is a case to answer. The abject failure of the SFA to support an investigation is nothing other than a severe dereliction of duty. To hide behind the supposed damage to Scottish football's reputation that would occur by "raking over the coals" as they rather awkwardly put it is embarrassing and naive in the extreme. It is a long standing principle of any justice system within organisations that any potential wrongdoing must be investigated thoroughly and consequences brought to bear where wrongdoing is found to have taken place, no matter how long it takes, no matter what else may be dredged up in the process and no matter the damage to the reputation of those concerned. The fact that the SFA has chosen to bury its head in the sand and shy away from such a process serves only to further prove their substantial lack of fitness to oversee and govern our game. Time and again the SFA has proved itself unfit for purpose. The supposed damage to our game's reputation the SFA claims would occur by carrying out an investigation is nothing compared to he damage being done to our game's reputation by NOT carrying out an investigation into these matters. Not for the first time, the SFA has allowed itself to be manipulated and driven by fear of offending a big club and it's often rabid support rather than doing what is right and proper. For the good of Scottish football there MUST be a full and thorough investigation into this issue no matter the consequences for any individual(s) or organisation(s) concerned. And it must be fully open and transparent. It looks like once again it is going to be down to the fans to voice their opinions and force the issue. Spot on Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaggycoo Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 Regan at it again http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/scotland/41228081 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShedTA Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 Just now, shaggycoo said: Regan at it again http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/scotland/41228081 desperately trying to make it a celtic v rangers (sfa) issue. trying to isolate celtic, who should have had far more support from the other clubs. the actions of a desperate man... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parklife Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 Don't the SPFL board represent the clubs? So surely the fact they asked for a further review indicates that it is not "one club" asking for it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenneth Farrington Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 The Rangers fans are never slow at insisting the SFA are 'corrupt to the core'. This is a chance to get to the bottom of what happened & hopefully force changes at the SFA. Strange they are so dead against it being looked at. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlueGaz Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 (edited) 23 minutes ago, Kenneth Farrington said: The Rangers fans are never slow at insisting the SFA are 'corrupt to the core'. This is a chance to get to the bottom of what happened & hopefully force changes at the SFA. Strange they are so dead against it being looked at. It is not as simple as that. If it was a review to find out how it was allowed to happen, how it was able to happen with a view to changing/tightening up rules etc. so it couldn't happen again, or to set out punishments if it did, then I don't think there would be much argument at all against it. At first I thought that it was going to go ahead and that this would be the case. But the Celtic letters mention possibly further sanctions/punishments, which is why I believe a lot of Rangers fans are quite rightly against it. Personally, I don't really care if it goes ahead or not. Edited September 11, 2017 by BlueGaz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoonTheSlope Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 Hibs statement has Petrie all over it. Scandalous. Either he's looking after number 1 or he knew and was looked after it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macy37 Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 Can anyone answer why Celtic appear to be the only club looking for this to happen? A lot of fans of different clubs do yet as far as I can see no clubs bar Celtic are pushing for this despite the fans in general pushing for it to happen. Scottisf football has a lot to hide possibly? Not just the governing body... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewolf_1980 Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 By seemingly backing one lone howling wolf, the spfl have given credence to the suggestion that Doncaster is nothing more than Lawwell's lap-dog. Rarely do I believe Regan but this would be a conspiracy of epic proportions involving multiple individuals/organisations, some of whom are not involved in football. This is why football is run by businessmen rather than bloodlustful dafties. It would be anarchy otherwise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deecie Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 This still a thing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoonTheSlope Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 (edited) A lot of people with a lot of things to hide In any other country there would be demos and boycotts etc. Easter Road and any other ground who's board have shat it would be empty. Hampden should be empty for internationals IMO but this country is full of happy clapping shitebags and we deserve everything we get Edited September 11, 2017 by DoonTheSlope Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deecie Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 7 minutes ago, DoonTheSlope said: Hampden should be empty for internationals IMO but this country is full of happy clapping shitebags and we deserve everything we get You're welcome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShedTA Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 2 hours ago, DoonTheSlope said: Hibs statement has Petrie all over it. Scandalous. Either he's looking after number 1 or he knew and was looked after it He's after sfa president role. Also was in on the whole sordid mess so why would he want it investigated? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShedTA Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 44 minutes ago, thewolf_1980 said: By seemingly backing one lone howling wolf, the spfl have given credence to the suggestion that Doncaster is nothing more than Lawwell's lap-dog. Rarely do I believe Regan but this would be a conspiracy of epic proportions involving multiple individuals/organisations, some of whom are not involved in football. This is why football is run by businessmen rather than bloodlustful dafties. It would be anarchy otherwise. Easy to sort all of this. Agree to an independent review. Put it all to bed once and for all. Piss easy - why not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu101 Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 2 hours ago, DoonTheSlope said: Hibs statement has Petrie all over it. Scandalous. Either he's looking after number 1 or he knew and was looked after it Keep this up, and Hibs will be coming off the list Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbcmfc Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 44 minutes ago, deecie said: This still a thing? I know. 11 minutes ago, ShedTA said: Easy to sort all of this. Agree to an independent review. Put it all to bed once and for all. Piss easy - why not? Have we not had one of those. Can anyone really be bothered anymore? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.