W C 2022 Poll

[Mod11]

As requested

[John_B81]

Voted USA because there isn't an option for Australia. 2022 was a non-European hosts event so why is England an option?

[Parklife]

I'm proud to be the first No voter

[harrystarfish]

Second question is a bit restricted IMO - it shouldn't be two European countries in a row so the only other choice is US. Should be USA / Australia, no?

[MacWalka]

Shite poll.

[TartanJon]

I voted No

Feck Austraila as well.Its four weeks away by plane ya mental bastards.

[John_B81]

I voted No

Feck Austraila as well.Its four weeks away by plane ya mental bastards.

21 hours from Glasgow to Sydney. Using travel as an excuse not to host a tournament there is a pathetic one.

[Geed]

I voted No

Feck Austraila as well.Its four weeks away by plane ya mental bastards.

This lol

Think Australia have withdrawn interest hosting it now, but USA and England declared interest in hosting if it is taken away from Qatar

Edited June 3, 2015 by Geed

[TartanJon]

21 hours from Glasgow to Sydney. Using travel as an excuse not to host a tournament there is a pathetic one.

Aye 21 hours and £1500 in a plane away from the hardcore of supporters is no excuse.

[TartanJon]

Games on at 4am/6am and 8am for the biggest TV audience haha!

Even Sepp Blatter is not that daft

[John_B81]

Games on at 4am/6am and 8am for the biggest TV audience haha!

Even Sepp Blatter is not that daft

Korea/Japan games were on at 7am & 12.30pm, ok for a weekend but during the week the mainstream audience are working. Didn't stop them getting the World Cup and nor it should.

What you're basically saying is that it's not convenient for the European nations to go Australia for a tournament but it's perfectly acceptable to ask them, New Zealand and so on to make the same journey over to Europe at similar expenses? Love your Equal Rights policy...

[TartanJon]

Yes .Far less hassle to ask 8 students on a gap year who don't know a soccer ball from Rolf Harris to come to Europe than 200,000 + actual football fans to travel to the arse end of the world where spiders can kill you.

It's just common sense

[John_B81]

So you think Qatar should keep the World Cup even though thousands have already died because of shocking working conditions but Australia shouldn't ever get it because a couple of spiders may kill a person? Priceless!!!!!!

[Mitre]

As requested

This should be in TA Specific ya defeatist bam

[GRBear]

England, we won't have far to travel and we can win it in their backyard?

No Brainer.

[ALBANACH]

I wouldn't want it in Australia, it would get in the way of my Aussie Rules season like the stupid Cricket Workd Cup has done!

[Brassrubber]

No and USA all the way ABE.

[TartanDave]

Yes and England for me. Easy to drive too and watch scotland in a world cup.

[deecie]

Fife should host it.

It's bigger, has a larger population and had more football stadiums than Qatar.

We'd also learn if Messi could do it on a cold rainy night in Methill.

[Brassrubber]

If England had got it in the first place would there have been all the recent hoohah I wonder or would those bribes have been better disguised.

[John_B81]

If England had got it in the first place would there have been all the recent hoohah I wonder or would those bribes have been better disguised.

It's not just England who are complaining.

From the minute Qatar were voted in, the whole thing just smelled of corruption and was never going to go down well. A nation one-fifth the population of Scotland and no football heritage whatsoever getting the biggest sporting event on the planet! Hmm

[vanderark14]

It's too late to go back now

I voted USA but only because it was the least shit of both options. If it had to be moved and I had any say in it, I'd give it to Australia

[Slide tackle]

Fife should host it.

It's bigger, has a larger population and had more football stadiums than Qatar.

We'd also learn if Messi could do it on a cold rainy night in Methill.

New 50,000 seat stadium in my hometown of lochgelly, messi will sh1te himself

[At U Peter]

I voted for England purely down to convenience

[hunchy]

Voted for USA only because it was the non euro option. I think it would be easy enough for England to host it as they have enough (I think) stadiums already in place then it would only come down to getting the infrastructure