Is Donald Trump's Campaign A Spoof? - Page 88 - Anything Goes - Other topics not covered elsewhere - Tartan Army Message Board Jump to content

Is Donald Trump's Campaign A Spoof?


Recommended Posts

If this whole story does not go huge... it will be huge.

Wikileaks have said it is him and now this guy. I think it is him. :lol: 

And they murdered him and it is crude. I can't see this one going away. All that talk about a new watergate... well this one has the power to actually deliver turbo charged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/24/2017 at 9:10 AM, thplinth said:

If this whole story does not go huge... it will be huge.

Wikileaks have said it is him and now this guy. I think it is him. :lol: 

And they murdered him and it is crude. I can't see this one going away. All that talk about a new watergate... well this one has the power to actually deliver turbo charged.

Been following this as well. 

Wikileaks have all but admitted that he was the source of the Clinton email leaks as well. 

The DNC lawsuit is really interesting as well, especially as their defence is basically that it's their right to rig the primaries. Absolutely no mainstream coverage that I'm aware of. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 23/05/2017 at 0:56 PM, thplinth said:

 according to Robert Fisk, a celebrated English writer and journalist.

 

 

I saw his book on the middle east in waterstones on thursday when i was in with my gran. I made a mental note to look at it, but it was freaking huge and really heavy material so i passed it up and decided to get it another time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's weird the Rich story has been spiked heavily by the parents. Also loads of advertisers fleeing from it. Advertisers could be political pressure, but the parents aren't.

 

Yet it seems loads of folk in the know say it he was the whistleblower or at least heavily implying he was.

I'm unsure what to think, ostensibly it's a dead-end. Might need some distance between events until the truth starts to unfold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I am BEYOND done with Brad Bauman, DNC crisis specialist who is family spokesman for Rich's framing legitimate questions and concerns around Seth's murder as hurtful to the family.  THIS IS A MURDER INVESTIGATION.  To pursue a highly logical train of investigation and frame it as cruel to the family to discredit the legitimacy is BEYOND manipulative.  The people disrespecting Rich's family  are not those asking serious questions and pursuing a reasonable thread of motive and timeline of investigation. No, the people who are disrespecting Seth's family are those USING the family to shield legitimate investigation.  All recent statements from family are channeled through these Democratic PR strategists.  It is BIZARRE to be having family members dismiss importance of even future evidence on the grounds it may be faked.  And, lastly, in terms of the actual investigation, the Rich's family opinion of what is and is not significant is NOT the defining factor on whether that information IS important.  In fact, since the family is so CLOSE to it and they are bound to be far more emotional and less objective.  It is RIDICULOUS to talk about not pursuing ANY logical thread of investigation because it upsets the family.  And, the fact that people would actually join in and call for people to CEASE asking legitimate questions on this basis shows citizens divorced from any semblance of critical thinking.  Wikileaks has all BUT stated Rich is the leaker, they retweet near every story that implies that he is the source, they offered a REWARD for his murder.  Meanwhile, we have a investigation that appears to meet the definition of coverup.  So, no.  I won't be shutting up about this investigation and I will continue to highlight relevant information.  I am concerned that the framing of the facts is now being obfuscated by the non-evidence of Kim Dotcom (I will withhold judgement til actual evidence is produced from this individual, not some vague statements of possible future evidence) and Hannity being the individual carrying the torch for this investigation.  This doesn't help our cause and I would suggest sharing information outside these two sources based on the known facts as much as possible."

lifted from the sane progressive Facebook page. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-06-01/mattis-us-annihilate-islamic-state-caliphate-civilian-casualties-fact-life

Mattis: US To "Annihilate" Islamic State Caliphate, Civilian Casualties A "Fact Of Life"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, kumnio said:

Pulls out of the climate change agreement. 

There are cvnts I know that voted for him, who are not stupid by any means, who deny point blank that climate change isn't happening at all. :banghead:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
2 minutes ago, thplinth said:

They've now found that little boy that was all over the news, turns out his family are Assad supporters and he was safe, but the white helmets were trying to run a propaganda campaign through him.

All nonsense, anything to goes to wreck the balk-anise the middle east. Hezbollah and Iran left if Syria goes down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it did not take long did it...

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/06/27/syria-could-be-planning-chemical-attack-white-house-says.html

Next false flag on it's way and President Dumbass will order a massive airstrike to reduce what remains of Syria back to the stone age. Count on it. Only I am not sure the Russians will just sit back this time. The guy is unbelievably naive here. He is frighteningly stupid, like a spoilt child, with a massive ego and his finger on the button. That Hersh article has confirmed my every worst fear about what was going on behind the scenes leading up the 59 missles strike. I now fear Trump might be slightly messianic coupled with his deep deep ignorance. Apparently he never reads, never has. Read like one book his whole life. He is so ignorant at times it makes him highly manipulable. The speech in Saudi showed him up. We are so fhucked here. I am actually praying he does get taken down at this point. Shame as he was doing all right despite the endless media onslaught telling you otherwise.

Speaking of which... Project Veritas does it again. Very interesting insights. Fake news. It really is true!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, thplinth said:

Well it did not take long did it...

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/06/27/syria-could-be-planning-chemical-attack-white-house-says.html

Next false flag on it's way and President Dumbass will order a massive airstrike to reduce what remains of Syria back to the stone age. Count on it. Only I am not sure the Russians will just sit back this time. The guy is unbelievably naive here. He is frighteningly stupid, like a spoilt child, with a massive ego and his finger on the button. That Hersh article has confirmed my every worst fear about what was going on behind the scenes leading up the 59 missles strike. I now fear Trump might be slightly messianic coupled with his deep deep ignorance. Apparently he never reads, never has. Read like one book his whole life. He is so ignorant at times it makes him highly manipulable. The speech in Saudi showed him up. We are so fhucked here. I am actually praying he does get taken down at this point. Shame as he was doing all right despite the endless media onslaught telling you otherwise.

Speaking of which... Project Veritas does it again. Very interesting insights. Fake news. It really is true!

 

I thought  you were a Trump fan?  You changed your view?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is his foreign policy. He is clueless.

Roberts has been on this for a while now. http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/47321.htm

Quote

 

Are the Washington Post editors trying to bring on nuclear armageddon? If there was any intelligence present in the Washington Post, the newspaper would be urging that President Trump immediately call President Putin with reassurances and arrange the necessary meetings to defuse the situation. Instead the utterly stupid editors urge actions that can only raise the level of tension. It should be obvious even to the Washington Post morons that Russia is not going to sit there, shaking in its boots, and wait for Washington’s attack. Putin has issued many warnings about the West’s rising threat to Russian security. He has said that Russia “will never again fight a war on its own territory.” He has said that the lesson he has learned is that “if a fight is unavoidable, strike first.” He has also said that the fact that no one hears his warnings makes the situation even more dangerous.

....

So, where is President Trump? Why is the President of the United States unable to rise to the challenge? Why isn’t he the man Ronald Reagan was? Is it, as David Stockman says, that Trump is incapable of anything except tweeting? http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/47310.htm

Why hasn’t President Trump long ago ordered all intercepts of Russian chatter gathered, declassified, and made public? Why hasn’t Trump launched a criminal prosecution against John Brennan, Susan Rice, Comey, and the rest of the hit squad that is trying to destroy him?

Why has Trump disarmed himself with an administration chosen by Russiaphobes and Israel?

As David Stockman writes, Trump “is up against a Deep State/Dem/Neocon/mainstream media prosecution” and “has no chance of survival short of an aggressive offensive” against those working to destroy him. But there is no Trump offensive, “because the man is clueless about what he is doing in the White House and is being advised by a cacophonous coterie of amateurs and nincompoops. So he has no action plan except to impulsively reach for his Twitter account.”

Our president twitters while he and Earth itself are pushed toward destruction.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, thplinth said:

It is his foreign policy. He is clueless.

Roberts has been on this for a while now. http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/47321.htm

 

Genuinely interesting.  You were blowing the trumpet like nothing else during the election campaign.

Didn't you think he seemed a bit clueless from the start?  "We'll take THEIR oil" and all that haha. 

I wonder how many of his zealots over in the States have changed their tune as well.  Personally, from someone who couldn't believe anybody would support such a comic, I think he's weirdly roughed it out quite well.  The stuff that should bury him won't.  Not that I agree with him.

not attacking you by the way; just find it amusing how such strong opinions can be reversed in a few months.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PapofGlencoe said:

Genuinely interesting.  You were blowing the trumpet like nothing else during the election campaign.

Didn't you think he seemed a bit clueless from the start?  "We'll take THEIR oil" and all that haha. 

I wonder how many of his zealots over in the States have changed their tune as well.  Personally, from someone who couldn't believe anybody would support such a comic, I think he's weirdly roughed it out quite well.  The stuff that should bury him won't.  Not that I agree with him.

not attacking you by the way; just find it amusing how such strong opinions can be reversed in a few months.   

Really. I notice you don't quote me. Your entire post is a pile of straw man shite so forgive me if I ignore you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I predicted he would win. You seem to want to make the discussion about me. Why is that? If you are really that interested just read the thread. I am not going to try to explain it all again to some smart arse talking pish on page 88.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/27/2017 at 0:20 PM, ParisInAKilt said:

To be fair he was probably a better candidate than Clinton at that time 

Even having seen him since he won and given the same straight choice again between him and Clinton and it would be Trump all the way. That is how bad Clinton was / is.

There is a chance Trump will realize he was wrong about the bullshit sarin gas attack (part of Hersh's motivation in writing about it). Small it looks like but still a chance. Plus some of the comments since make me wonder if the Trump WH was really talking to Assad or actually someone else... If he escalates it in Syria then he is at worst as bad as Clinton would have been. However domestically I think he may have turned a corner and could now start to do a lot better. The Russia thing has blown itself it seems out and I suspect Trump will do well at the mid terms. With him what does not kill him really does make him stronger. Talk about a a baptism of fire...I am just a little concerned (i.e. horrified) with his foreign policy. He is a real shoot from the hip cowboy it seems. Very dangerous as I think the Russians also have their red lines in Syria. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...