Andy Robertson For Arsenal Or Man United? - Page 2 - TA specific - Tartan Army Message Board Jump to content

Andy Robertson For Arsenal Or Man United?


King Of Paisley

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Actually don't think Shaw has been as impressive as Robertson this year. Not sure about Gibbs but don't think he has set the world alight either. Robbo had another solid game when I watched yesterday and really has massive potential for 20 yo who was playing for QP not that long ago. Another year or so at Hull prob makes sense as long as they don't get relegated

Shaw looks 2 stone overweight!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure about all credit to Gers for Telfer. He has now started more games for united in SPL than in how whole Gers career. He left because he was going nowhere and I hope many others at Old firm follow his lead. It will be United who make him if he does make it. Just like United changed Robertsons career and looking like doing same with Connoly and Spittall. Hearing very good things about Harry Souttar. Just turned 16 But regular in under 20s and about 6ft5 I believe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you sure that's right ? - and I'm not saying it isn't.

It's just that I was not aware of QP getting any money at all from Dundee Utd for Robertson. I remember reading an article, some time ago, in which QP praised Aberdeen for their dealings in giving them some money for Shankland, whilst at the same time criticising Dundee Utd, saying they had refused to give them anything, hiding behind the rules that said they did not have to give anything to QP, as they were an 'Amateur Club'.

As I said, I'm not saying what you have said is wrong but just that it is not what I read, a short time after he had moved to Dundee Utd.

This is correct and understand the confusion. Utd did not pay QP anything for him up front as they were not due to under the rules. Instead they agreed that if they sold him and made money out of him then QP should get 10% of the fee. Great result for queens park and utd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ha ha ha... Yeh a right bam pot. Signs a player off queens park for nothing and a year later gets £2,700,000 for him. F@cking mug right enough!! ???

£300,000 of which had to be given to queens shortly after he refused to pay them £15,000. bampot

Edited by ProudScot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

£300,000 of which had to be given to queens shortly after he refused to pay them £15,000. bampot

No you don't get it. I have already deducted the 300k from the 3 million. So Thompson in fact shared a large part of the windfall with QP, in fact they recieved far more from us than from other clubs. Complete bampot right enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 so far - better than nothing. There is no hiding the seeth from you is there. The seeth and the hatred directed at my club. No guessing who you support.

I have nothing against Utd and don't support Rangers

I don't like Thompson, few non Utd fans do.

Utd's poaching of QP players is well known and they are trying the same with Rangers for Telfer, hence the tribunal.

your inability to be impartial is the most obvious thing in this thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have nothing against Utd and don't support Rangers

I don't like Thompson, few non Utd fans do.

Utd's poaching of QP players is well known and they are trying the same with Rangers for Telfer, hence the tribunal.

your inability to be impartial is the most obvious thing in this thread

I was going to say that the difference between Queens Park and Rangers is that Rangers pay tax!

:blush:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have nothing against Utd and don't support Rangers

I don't like Thompson, few non Utd fans do.

Utd's poaching of QP players is well known and they are trying the same with Rangers for Telfer, hence the tribunal.

your inability to be impartial is the most obvious thing in this thread

Apologies for my non impartiality but please point out where this has influenced the facts as I have stated them? Thanks to utd QP have earned 10 times what they might have off Robertson. Re Thompson now that is where I might not be impartial. Can't say I know him personally but due to what he has done for utd and the way he conducts himself in putting utd first in every case he is certainly not a bampot. Hard nosed maybe but bampot? FFS.

Are you like chick young then? I.e. A st mirren ahem fan?

Edited by ShedTA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have nothing against Utd and don't support Rangers

I don't like Thompson, few non Utd fans do.

Utd's poaching of QP players is well known and they are trying the same with Rangers for Telfer, hence the tribunal.

your inability to be impartial is the most obvious thing in this thread

I like Thompson.

Would have him as our chairman in heartbeat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...



×
×
  • Create New...