A Case For Jordan Rhodes - Page 3 - TA specific - Tartan Army Message Board Jump to content

A Case For Jordan Rhodes


ScotlandFanMuir

Recommended Posts

So one game not scoring, or looking out of your depth means you are out ? Fletcher must have those pesky incriminating photos of WGS then..... :shocked:

No but i dont think he is the player to start on his own up front which is stachans preferred system, he has only really looked good against Australia and Luxembourg when we have played two up front. He is a great option to have coming off the bench when we need a goal though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

For me, we've got to try Rhodes in a few games. How long have we bemoaned the lack of a goal scorer? We have one of the most consistent in the UK yet hardly pick him! He does need to move from Blackburn and be continually tested at the highest level, I feel the transfer fee is hindering him now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely you aren't comparing Lewandowski to Rhodes?!

That's a bit of a leap you're making. Our in-form strikers are Griffiths and Rhodes. Poland's is v clearly Lewandowski. We however are likely to start with Fletcher to no doubt be replaced at some point by Martin. That would be like Poland keeping Lewandowski on the bench. Nothing about Griffiths or Rhodes being anywhere near he standard of Lewandowski.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The clamour for Rhodes is predictable. We better get plenty supply into the penalty box if we play him as he can't hold the ball up, run the channels or track back. Would be suicide to start him against Poland. Wont happen in a million years however...Gibraltar away.....now that's a different matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually it's not all. Rhodes

I wonder if the view that Rhodes cannae play up top on his own comes from actually seeing him play ? I clearly remember thinking that we had a proper striker on our hands when the u21's won 2-1 in Holland, Rhodes scoring early from a Forrest cross. The other 'forward' players that night being Wylde and Wotherspoon, so Rhodes was on his own and he played well. He has continued to do that on occasion at Blackburn, although the situation can be fluid with the likes of Gestede playing up beside him.

I actually feel sorry for Steven Fletcher, as he would benefit from a partner. I would play Fletcher and Rhodes, with both rotating to supplement the midfield when we don't have the ball. Fed up seeing Fletcher winning headers but nobody running past him. Rhodes is a worker as well, and Blackburn fans will tell you how much running and closing down he does.

I think you'll find that the view that Rhodes can't play up top on his own, mainly comes from the fact that CaledonianCraig is a boring, repetitive fecker who hasn't got the first clue what he's on about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geiffiths has never looked anything but lost at international level. Rhodes would score 50 goals a year for Celtic, but he's not the kind of striker Scotland use. That's why Kenny Miller was picked before Kris Boyd.

Two things wrong with that statement in my opinion Adam. Firstly Jordan Rhodes is nothing like Kris Boyd as a player and secondly, Boyd would have been picked much more for Scotland if he hadn't been such a cock of a guy. Nothing to do with his style of play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes Rhodes used to be a poacher type of player but after what she said about him he has buckled down and is developing into a more rounded striker. Alot of his goals now come from him making runs and holding play up. Maybe if the doubters were to watch him more now they would see that he has progressed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes Rhodes used to be a poacher type of player but after what she said about him he has buckled down and is developing into a more rounded striker. Alot of his goals now come from him making runs and holding play up. Maybe if the doubters were to watch him more now they would see that he has progressed

That's my issue with the opinions being offered as FACT that Rhodes can't close down/win headers/control and lay off to runners etc etc..........he does exactly that with blackburn, and a wee look at their fans opinions would suggest they are happy with his contribution in these areas. He is absolutely a finisher, and whilst that is his main quality, he can do the less glamourous stuff as well. Maybe not as good as Fletcher in overall play, but way ahead in terms of scoring goals. So I understand the choices made by Strachan, but I want him to be bolder by playing both Fletcher and Rhodes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's my issue with the opinions being offered as FACT that Rhodes can't close down/win headers/control and lay off to runners etc etc..........he does exactly that with blackburn, and a wee look at their fans opinions would suggest they are happy with his contribution in these areas. He is absolutely a finisher, and whilst that is his main quality, he can do the less glamourous stuff as well. Maybe not as good as Fletcher in overall play, but way ahead in terms of scoring goals. So I understand the choices made by Strachan, but I want him to be bolder by playing both Fletcher and Rhodes.

Fair enough. Perhaps people such as myself should word it differently then in that Strachan evidently (who picks the team incidentally) doesn't see him as a viable alternative in the system that he plays. You concede yourself that his overall play is not as good as Fletcher's so you can understand why Fletcher gets the nod then? I do agree I'd prefer us to mould our system to suit situations as one up front is not the answer in certain situations ie Georgia away and many home games. However, I still doubt Rhodes. He had half an hour against a tiring Gibraltar and never even got a sniff - I am sorry but that is far from a glowing indictment of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've not read through the whole thread so apologies if this is repeating. The problem with Rhodes is he just seems to have no impact when hes on the pitch.he doesn't,get himself into goalscoring positions, defenders seem very comfortable handling him and the lack of pace really hurts him at international level. I just don't,see him ever doing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair enough. Perhaps people such as myself should word it differently then in that Strachan evidently (who picks the team incidentally) doesn't see him as a viable alternative in the system that he plays. You concede yourself that his overall play is not as good as Fletcher's so you can understand why Fletcher gets the nod then? I do agree I'd prefer us to mould our system to suit situations as one up front is not the answer in certain situations ie Georgia away and many home games. However, I still doubt Rhodes. He had half an hour against a tiring Gibraltar and never even got a sniff - I am sorry but that is far from a glowing indictment of him.

You keep using the Gib argument as if it has major relevance. So Rhodes can score against the likes of Derby and QPR but not a tiring Gibraltar. This means you consider he is not good enough for international football ergo that Gibraltar are of a better quality than any Champinship team. You are becoming a parody and despite my better judgment, best avoided.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two things wrong with that statement in my opinion Adam. Firstly Jordan Rhodes is nothing like Kris Boyd as a player and secondly, Boyd would have been picked much more for Scotland if he hadn't been such a cock of a guy. Nothing to do with his style of play.

Kris Boyd is a throbbing cock of a man. You wouldn't get any argument from me there.

I admit, I haven't seen Rhodes in a while, maybe he has built his all round game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you'll find that the view that Rhodes can't play up top on his own, mainly comes from the fact that CaledonianCraig is a boring, repetitive fecker who hasn't got the first clue what he's on about.

Can you add Gordon Strachan in there then? Evidently, he doesn't rate him enough to give him a game either. Why not quit the insults and try debating like pointing to his credentials of scoring in top flight football and explaining how he never scored in 30 minutes against a tiring Gibraltar side if he is the hot shot you think he is? I sincerely hope I am wrong about him but just as there are those on here who don't rate Forrest and swear he'll never make it then I feel the same is the case for Rhodes. The only way I see it changing is if Strachan completely overhauls his playing system or unearths a creative midfielder who can open up defences with long range passes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...



×
×
  • Create New...