dandydunn Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Roooooooooooney!!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deecie Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Roooooooooooney!!!!!!! It's been a good week for this lad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cove_Sheep Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Utter stupidity from the Thistle defender. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rossy Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 McGinn's had a good first half. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rossy Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Hmm. Osman led into McGinn with his elbow there. Seen plenty of players yellow carded for that... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flynnyboy Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Hmm. Osman led into McGinn with his elbow there. Seen plenty of players yellow carded for that... You can hardly complain. You got a pen from a corner that you should never of had. Ever. Ridiculous decision or non decision more accurately. In addition when did the handball law change? Oh that's right it hasn't. It still has to be deliberate. Osman is looking the other way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deecie Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 You can hardly complain. You got a pen from a corner that you should never of had. Ever. Ridiculous decision or non decision more accurately. In addition when did the handball law change? Oh that's right it hasn't. It still has to be deliberate. Osman is looking the other way. 1-0. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cove_Sheep Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 You can hardly complain. You got a pen from a corner that you should never of had. Ever. Ridiculous decision or non decision more accurately. In addition when did the handball law change? Oh that's right it hasn't. It still has to be deliberate. Osman is looking the other way. The penalty award would follow the pre-season guidelines issued. As for the flag staying down, did Goodwillie prevent Gallacher from "playing or being able to play the ball"? The answer to that is no, so the corner award was correct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLAS Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Wully Collum fukkin hates us. Why not stop the game for a ball to the face and the player looks out cold? Should never been a corner which led to the penalty, which was a pen to be fair. Was also under the impression if the game is stopped for a head knock, the player must go off? McGinn didn't need to go off for whatever reason. This game is over. Collum has seen to that already. We'll get nothing from him. I'd be surprised if we've ever won a game with him in charge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cove_Sheep Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Wully Collum fukkin hates us. Why not stop the game for a ball to the face and the player looks out cold? Should never been a corner which led to the penalty, which was a pen to be fair. Was also under the impression if the game is stopped for a head knock, the player must go off? McGinn didn't need to go off for whatever reason. This game is over. Collum has seen to that already. We'll get nothing from him. I'd be surprised if we've ever won a game with him in charge. Player would only need to go off if they get treatment (unless one from each team or a goalkeeper). Corner award was correct under laws of the game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie Endell Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 (edited) Wully Collum fukkin hates us. Why not stop the game for a ball to the face and the player looks out cold? Should never been a corner which led to the penalty, which was a pen to be fair. Was also under the impression if the game is stopped for a head knock, the player must go off? McGinn didn't need to go off for whatever reason. This game is over. Collum has seen to that already. We'll get nothing from him. I'd be surprised if we've ever won a game with him in charge. Spot on. Edited November 23, 2014 by Charlie Endell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLAS Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 (edited) The penalty award would follow the pre-season guidelines issued. As for the flag staying down, did Goodwillie prevent Gallacher from "playing or being able to play the ball"? The answer to that is no, so the corner award was correct. So if he shimmies towards the flight of the ball and then ducks, it's still not interfering?That's what happened. No need to even duck if he wasn't interfering. Edited November 23, 2014 by OLAS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flynnyboy Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 The penalty award would follow the pre-season guidelines issued. As for the flag staying down, did Goodwillie prevent Gallacher from "playing or being able to play the ball"? The answer to that is no, so the corner award was correct. He clearly hindered Gallagher's ability to play the ball with the movement he made that put gallacher off thus interfering. What are the guidelines listed? I only know the laws of the game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cove_Sheep Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 (edited) So if he shimmies towards the flight of the ball and then ducks, it's still not interfering? That's what happened. No need to even duck if he wasn't interfering. Here are the three relevant definitions: Interfering with play means playing or touching the ball passed or touched by a team-mate So, no offence on that account. Interfering with an opponent means preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent's line of vision or challenging the opponent for the ball Again, he did not prevent Gallacher from being able to play the ball, so, no offence on that account. Gaining an advantage by being in that position means playing a ball: 1 - that rebounds or is deflected to him off the goalpost, crossbar or an opponent having been in an offside position 2 - that rebounds, is deflected or is played to him from a deliberate save by an opponent having been in an offside position A player in an offside position receiving the ball from an opponent, who deliberately plays the ball (except from a deliberate save), is not considered to have gained an advantage. This part is not applicable in this case. Edited November 23, 2014 by Cove_Sheep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redz Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 I'd agree. He makes a clear move towards the ball. Is that not offside? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cove_Sheep Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 I'd agree. He makes a clear move towards the ball. Is that not offside? Read the definitions above. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLAS Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Read the definitions above. He made a move towards the flight of the ball and ducked out the way. Ducking out the way infers it was about to hit him and therefore would have been in Gallagher's line of sight. Wrong decision but totally expected from Collum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cove_Sheep Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 He made a move towards the flight of the ball and ducked out the way. Ducking out the way infers it was about to hit him and therefore would have been in Gallagher's line of sight. Wrong decision but totally expected from Collum. Are you claiming he prevented Gallacher from playing the ball? If he prevented Gallacher from playing the ball, it should have been a goal kick then... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLAS Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 We can't change it now. Hayes is a great player. Very impressed. Pawlett just the one dive. Good for him Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cove_Sheep Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 We can't change it now. Hayes is a great player. Very impressed. Pawlett just the one dive. Good for him Stewart used to hate Hayes. He rates him now. To be fair, he did struggle to settle in initially. If he didn't go mental at start of LC Final, I think we'd have won it in the 90. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redz Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Read the definitions above. Have you cut and pasted all the options though? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLAS Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Are you claiming he prevented Gallacher from playing the ball? If he prevented Gallacher from playing the ball, it should have been a goal kick then... He put Gallagher off as he was in his line of sight. He also appeared to be making a play for the ball while coming from an offside position. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cove_Sheep Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Have you cut and pasted all the options though? Yes. That is the definitions for the three occasions when being in an offside position would be an offence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cove_Sheep Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 He put Gallagher off as he was in his line of sight. He also appeared to be making a play for the ball while coming from an offside position. FFS, you are just not getting it are you. To be interfering with play he actually had to TOUCH THE BALL - he didn't. To be interfering with Gallacher, he would have had to prevent him from playing the ball - he didn't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rossy Posted November 23, 2014 Share Posted November 23, 2014 Not exactly a classic this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.