Rosetta The Comet Chaser - Anything Goes - Other topics not covered elsewhere - Tartan Army Message Board Jump to content

Rosetta The Comet Chaser


Recommended Posts

In just over a months time the ESA Rosetta spcaecraft will reach the most important stage of it's10 year mission, when they attempt to put the lander, Philae, on the surface of Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. If it succeeds it will be the first time a man made object has made a soft landing on the surface of a comet.

http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Science/Rosetta/Rosetta_to_deploy_lander_on_12_November

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 144
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It will be interesting to find out the general make-up of comets. It is generally thought they contain the building blocks of life.

I am interested in the chemistry side of it as well but it takes months or sometimes years for them to analyse the data and it's not very exciting. There wont be any Eureka moments. At best they will just add a bit more to the information we already have. For me the exciting bit is that we have the technology to do it. To send a space craft half way across our solar system and then land on a tiny wee comet. It sometimes makes me wonder why we haven't managed to master the art of getting trains to run on time. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are comets no fast , hurtling through space ?, is it a bugs bunny elevator type landing ?

It's all relative. The spacecraft is moving pretty fast too, depending on how you look at it. By the time the lander reaches the surface they should be travelling at almost exactly the same speed so relative to each other they will be hardly moving at all.

No elevators on comets so Bugs Bunny will have to use the stair landing like everybody else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am interested in the chemistry side of it as well but it takes months or sometimes years for them to analyse the data and it's not very exciting. There wont be any Eureka moments. At best they will just add a bit more to the information we already have. For me the exciting bit is that we have the technology to do it. To send a space craft half way across our solar system and then land on a tiny wee comet. It sometimes makes me wonder why we haven't managed to master the art of getting trains to run on time. :lol:

Ban passengers and trains would run just fine. As for the technology part of course it is fascinating and surely the technology is now there for a manned mission to Mars. Sadly, though mankind is still so totally divided that countries want to go it alone and that is just not feasible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ban passengers and trains would run just fine. As for the technology part of course it is fascinating and surely the technology is now there for a manned mission to Mars. Sadly, though mankind is still so totally divided that countries want to go it alone and that is just not feasible.

Apparently the risk of cancer is too great to send men to Mars even with today's space suits, maybe one day though, would like to be around for this seeming as the moon landing was before my time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently the risk of cancer is too great to send men to Mars even with today's space suits, maybe one day though, would like to be around for this seeming as the moon landing was before my time.

Its not cancer, its the risk of getting fried by a flare. When you're out there for twelve months the risks increase, but there are multiple proposed ways to protect astronauts. Main problem is money; if govts were prepared to invest the same kind of money as was put in to go to the moon, Mars would not be a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would also take fecking ages to get there and back. Something like 2-3 years. I'm sure you'll find eejits queueing up to do this but there's no way I'd waste that amount of life on something like that.

Six months each way if you time it right. Those times are about fourteen months apart though so a two and a half year mission. The fourteen months on Mars would be at a third of earth gravity; I have no idea if this level of gravity would negate the long term worries about zero/low gravity on the human body. That's probably the main concern. Test missions (robotic) will be sent to start mining water and set up other facilities which will be required for that length of stay, e.g. a facility splitting Co2 to create oxygen. So your astronauts would arrive at a base which has been, to some extent, pre-engineered and is up and running prior to their arrival, with long term water and oxygen supplies.

This will happen in the next twenty to thirty years.

Edited by biffer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...



×
×
  • Create New...