Ally Bongo

I see Mairi McAllan has glammed herself up and went with blonde highlights She must be the Sturgeon camp's next choice v Forbes

Like mostly everyone I'm fed up saying Humza is a liability and needs to go However it's got to the state of a cringe every week The SNP will be lucky to win one seat at the GE if they go into it with him at the helm He must sit in front of his phone thinking - what can i tweet in order to lose some more SNP voters

https://www.icr.ac.uk/blogs/science-talk/page-details/when-it-comes-to-cancer-how-does-alcohol-compare-to-smoking What about alcohol? Awareness of the link between alcohol and cancer, however, is not anywhere near as high. A recent survey suggests only 13 per cent of people understand cancer is one of the health risks associated with alcohol consumption. We don’t yet have the same vast body of evidence for the effects of alcohol compared to smoking, but we do know that alcohol itself can directly cause damage to cells that can trigger cancer, and there is evidence that alcohol consumption increases the risk of seven different types of cancer – that of the mouth, throat, voice box, oesophagus, bowel, liver and breast. Moderate drinking In an attempt to increase public awareness, a new study published in the journal BMC Public Health has estimated the cancer risks associated with moderate alcohol consumption, and drawn a comparison with levels of smoking. The authors of the research, from University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Bangor University and University of Southampton, found the risk of cancer from drinking one bottle of wine a week was equivalent to smoking 10 cigarettes a week for women and five cigarettes for men. If non-smoking women and men drank a bottle of wine every week, their lifetime risk of cancer would increase by 1.4 per cent for women, and one percent for men. In real terms, if 1,000 women and 1,000 men each drank one bottle of wine per week, it’s likely that around 14 extra women and 10 extra men would develop cancer at some point in their life. Heavier alcohol consumption On the surface, five or 10 cigarettes a week doesn’t sound like a lot. But we need to put that into drinking habits of the nation. The Office for National Statistics reported in their recent 2019 survey that 60 per cent of adults in the UK report they drink up to 14 units a week. That’s quite a lot of people with a moderate increase in risk. The survey also revealed that 17 per cent of adults – so more than the number of smokers in the UK – reported the drink between 14 and 50 units and 4 per cent reported drinking 50 or more. How do these levels affect risk? The BMC Public Health study also looked into heavier levels of alcohol consumption and estimated that drinking three bottles of wine per week (around 30 units) could increase lifetime cancer risk by 3.6 per cent in women and 1.9 per cent in men, or 36 in 1,000 women and 19 in 1,000 men. That’s apparently the equivalent to smoking roughly eight cigarettes per week for men and 23 cigarettes per week for women.

Did you actually read what BIS said ? They wanted ALBA to have a speaker so they asked them first If ALBA had committed they would not have asked the Greens knowing they would not stand beside ALBA (presumably on their women with cocks stance)

They will pay for any arms we give them They will not pay for RAF Jets helping them afaik

No doubt there will be an imminent stooshie about that and it will be moved

Not a good look from the best FM we have ever had https://www.believeinscotland.org/bis_responds_to_alba_s_statement_on_believe_in_scotland_s_march_and_rally

We were paying the USA back until 2006 for the lend lease program - i think it was just us that paid them back and the Russians gave the middle finger So that was for Ships, Tanks, Guns and Ammunition that we used ourselves. We didnt pay for the military hardware that the US used themselves for fighting in Europe Therefore we will be paying for the cost of us defending Israel however by that rule of thumb i expect Ukraine to be paying us back for the next 60 years Unless they do what the Russians did in 1946

Pete Wishart trying to "defend" the "both votes SNP" tactic emphasises how the SNP are good wee Parliamentarians always abiding by the rules It's a lie because they could have easily got around it @PeteWishart But there’s no way we could ask people to vote for another party. It would be electoral suicide and political arrogance at its most gratuitous.

Remembered - Gemma Doyle What a vicious rat she is/was Notice she fucked off to London after her 2015 defeat and now spouts her anti SNP bile from there

There was another one - younger Trying my best to remember - her twitter feed was continual vomit stuff Aaid would remember - maybe had an irish sounding surname

There is another west coast Labour witch - i can't remember her name Blonde hair - was ousted ages ago and has nothing but bile for the SNP and Independence Thick as shit too

What if, and it's not a big if, all we have seen so far is the matinee and the end target has always been Iran ? The combination of internal revolt and Iran being a complete pain in the arse throughout the region may have finally made the US and their "allies" decide they have had enough ? It is starting to look like that and Iran are playing their game

This was written in January The odds of Iran now having a Nuclear weapon will be quite short https://isis-online.org/isis-reports/detail/how-quickly-could-iran-make-nuclear-weapons-today Institute For Science & International Security The unfortunate reality is that Iran already knows how to build nuclear weapons, although there are some unfinished tasks related to the actual construction of them. If the regime’s leadership decided to build them, how would it proceed? How long would it take? The long pole in the tent of building nuclear weapons is essentially complete. Iran can quickly make enough weapon-grade uranium for many nuclear weapons, something it could not do in 2003. Today, it would need only about a week to produce enough for its first nuclear weapon.3 It could have enough weapon-grade uranium for six weapons in one month, and after five months of producing weapon-grade uranium, it could have enough for twelve. The other major poles in the tent are “nuclear weaponization” and delivery. Iran has a variety of delivery systems, including nuclear-capable missiles: the delivery pole is ready. Weaponization is the pole that needs more work. It involves theoretical calculations and simulations; development, testing, and construction of the other components of the nuclear weapon; the conversion of weapon-grade uranium into metallic components; the integration of all the components into a nuclear weapon; and the preparation for mounting the weapons on aircraft or missiles or for use in a full-scale underground test. This pole includes the mastery of the high explosive triggering system, the molding and machining of high explosives, and the building of a neutron initiator that starts the chain reaction at just the right moment to create a nuclear explosion.

🤣